Tuesday, 23 September 2008

Chapter III: There is Always Room for a Good Product

At first I have to say that economics is not my strongest areas.. Quite often I have to struggle to stay awake while reading about it.. A non-market production? And in my field of activities..

Well, just to give you some mind-flow: Internet actually is a place where nonmarket productions can live. If you think you create something by yourself, meaning not that much people is needed to do the work, the costs of the product are not that huge. The first but is of course how to make your product visible. If you just put it so some server (there are some even free or almost free places) and don´t do anything to make it found, then you can say that you have just wasted your time.

Nowadays communities and networking with people and communities is "the thing", meaning blogs, wikis, galleries, Facebook, SecondLife and so on. So, your marketing plan contains a nice list of different places where to make your own profile and put your product in (or a link to it). Then you just have to be active, active and active. Make your friends, relatives and aquaintances test your product and write reviews about it until they beg you to stop. Spread the word. If your product is good and you have managed to find the right target group then the rest is history. Your product will spread through Internet like a wildfire.

Just are you good enough to create a new IRC-Gallery, MySpace or Wikipedia?

I think there is always a order for an innovative, smart and simple-to-use tool. For example to work collectively (enhance wikis) or study online (enhance for example Moodle). Or why not to just bring yourself up and known (enhance blogs).

Thursday, 18 September 2008

Chapter II: Examples and Analysis

Robert Theobald: "Mind-Quake"

A Mind-Quake is a concept which means a certain point in the process of change where the old model and old understanding lose their meaning and a new one must be obtained or constructed. It means the skill to cut and divide the major quakes into smaller ones which are easier to handle.

At first when you think of Theobald´s theory you might think of the different theories of education. Well, behaviorism isn´t all gone, but when combining it to constructivism the idea is totally different. Learning just isn´t a stimulus-reaction, there is always some relation to old information. And in constructivism you actually puzzle up your knowledge.

But where this theory of Theobald works more precise.. If you think of the large scale, some basics has changed in the society as a whole. Today´s world is fully colored with one word: hurry. And everything has to be efficient. It hasn´t always been like this. Just ask your parents. Also in olden times you always got service, today the trend is more to self-service. This means a total change in thinking. For example when you check-in to a flight: you have to use a machine alone, no more smiling receptionist taking your papers (OK this is optional still, which must be a relief to older people).

And this change of society works even in childcare: some things which were seen as good things a few decades ago are nowadays seen almost dangerous. This is easily seen when you ask your mom or grandmother to watch your child a few hours.. The collision is guaranteed..

And even when thinking of the ways of correspondence, there has been a long road from homing pigeons to emails, SMS and instant messages like Messenger. The model has changed quite hugely in every step. The latest change has recently become common and usual -but there are still some people who don´t want (or can or like) to use emails or SMS (for example my mother). But what a thrill it is to receive a letter or a postcard nowadays! When I was basic school it was quite common to have many pen pals, I wonder does the children of today have any? And when have you received a letter last time? I think I got one about a year ago.. And before that I can´t even remember. It´s a shame in a way that this is so rare, maybe letters and postcards come back in fashion some day.

Charles Handy: The Paradox of Time

The application of modem technology means less time is needed to make and do things. People should have more spare time. But time has become a competitive weapon and getting things done quickly is imperative. As a result, many of those who work have less time that ever before.

Well, I think quite many people can see this happening. It is so easy to get a certain picture or phrase or what ever from the other side of the world. You can quickly collect for example logos of the company´s in IT-business, create a birthday-card or send greetings to your aunt. Without going to a store and buying a magazine and cutting the logos from it, without buying and writing your card and handing it to the receiver or without the effort of writing with a pencil and then taking it to a post. Where goes all this spare time since you don´t have to leave your home? You do another task since it is done so quickly. You send greetings to ten people instead of one. It is so quick and easy.

This applies perfectly in technical support in companies. Well at least to the one in our company. Without modems their work was more related to client´s phone calls and doing some logs of what was done. With modem technology they can take remote control the client´s computer and solve almost any kind of problem without leaving their desk. Sounds like the job is done about ten times faster than before? Probably yes. There must be a lot of spare time? Noup. And this goes closely to the paradox of productivity. Since one client is helped so quickly there is no need to have so many support personnel. And even if there were the same amount of workers than before, seems like the client´s contact more easily and also with just minor problems and instantly, without even trying themselves before.

So, all the time is always spent. Spare time? People tend to think that the certain amount of time is needed to use in precise tasks, it feels weird to have more time to do nothing than before.

Manuel Castells: Changes in Work and Employment

Emergence of flexi-workers (working without fixed time, place, or regulations); new methods allow more flexible approaches, but also produce more stress and discontent; the share of temporary and telework increases.

In my latest workplace there has never been precise times when to go to work and in certain frame you can choose how long you work in each day, just the hours per month have to be enough. We have a slide in the morning, from 7-10am when it´s recommended to show up. Usually most of people manage to apply this but it´s not rare that some people show up around eleven. I think this is quite common in Finland, especially in IT-sector.

The direction really has been away from office working towards flexibility; this kind of flexibility belongs to this time of ours, everything is more or less in electronic form, so no time is needed to "move the papers around".

My employer has offered me the possibility to work from home some days a week when I return from my maternity leave. I can manage and tutor some web courses. How great is that! Really flexible, all thanks to Internet connection. The stress this creates is how to really find and maintain a reasonable schedule. To really do the reasonable amount of hours a day, not to do all the week´s work at once.. To know when to stop, how much to do to get the work done needed in that precise week or month. And of course it feels more important to prove my employer what I do. That they can rely on me, I do what is wanted. (And a bit more.. Since I´m a perfectionist..)

Discontent? Maybe those who don´t have this opportunity of flexibility feel left out, when thinking of a work community. But when thinking of a worker, the discontent comes from the temporary and short periods of employment. The amount of temporary workers has been increasing a long time, I don´t think it´s straight related to flexi-work.

Tuesday, 16 September 2008

Chapter I: Challenges to the Global Information Society

Some basic of the situation of information society, according to Himanen´s article, is that the new technology isn´t the issue, it is a new way of doing things. Also the development of the technology won´t help if it isn´t combined to the changes in structure. These deep structures are the ones which need the change.

The article of Himanen comes to a conclusion that development of the deep-set structures of society is the most critical aspect to the development of information society - these structures need our attention. In the article it is pointed out that information society is not same as an information network or Internet program.

Himanen presents ten major trends which are already in progress. First one has to do with increasing international tax competition, which means that countries reduce tax rates in order to compete for investments and skilled labor. The second trend is about the new global division of labour, meaning that cheaper countries like China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Russia and Brazil get the routine production. The more developed countries need to specialize to more creative work. Third trend is the aging of the population which is happening especially in Europe. Fourth trend is about increasing pressures on the welfare society, the first three trends cause this to happen. Fifth is second phase of the information society which means that the technical development (which started the first phase) continues focusing to social matters.

The sixth trend is the rise of cultural industries, meaning how information economy expands to the field of culture. Seventh trend is the rise of bio-industries. The eighth is about regional concentration which means how expertise concentrates to certain regions. Ninth trend is the deepening global divide which means the rise of inequality and marginalization. The tenth and last trend is the spread of a “culture of emergency”. It is about the acceleration of development which increases the volatility of economies.

Himanen also presents some development scenarios. From a geographical perspective USA, Europe and Asia are leading, USA has kind of a upper hand for example since one third of the world’s economy is in there. Still thinking geographically, there are also three different models: The Silicon Valley model, The Singapore model and The Finnish model. The first model refers to the neoliberalist scenario of “leaving the weak behind”, the second is based on tax competition, i.e. “a race to the bottom” and the third one is the current European combination of the information society and the welfare state. Due to the article, it really is possible to combine the welfare state and the information society, it just needs courage to revise this last mentioned model. There is a need to change from a reactive to a proactive policy, react beforehand and lead the way.

In the article there are also listed some values which are underlying the original European welfare state and innovative entrepreneurship. The values are caring, confidence, communality, encouragement, freedom, creativity, courage, visionariness, balance and meaningfulness. These are the values which make life worth living so they are important to any society.

But to meet the global competition with the scenario and values, it is important to notice also these concepts: A creative economy, a creative welfare society, humanly meaningful development and a global culture.

So, what is about creative economy? It is important to rely on creativity (and expertise) under these pressures of international tax competition and the new global division of labor. Creativity is the key when aims are in increasing the added value and to improve the efficiency of production. A creative welfare society on the other hand is about the goal of people having equal opportunities to realize their potential and are protected against the random misfortunes of life.

Humanly meaningful development has the core in the human sustainability, all the time rapidly crowing global development really is an important question in the information society. The global culture is about the fact that in global development the progress should be towards joint development that is sustainable on a world scale. Open mindedness is a key to that.

Pekka Himanen: CHALLENGES OF THE GLOBAL INFORMATION SOCIETY

Monday, 2 June 2008

EMIM / E-Learning / Assignment 10

What was your personal impression of participating such a course?
I enjoyed the course very much :)
I think the materials were very good and carefully chosen. Also this way of working, doing an actual course with a group is excellent choice. BUT to activate students and keep them working and most importantly together is VERY hard. To create the feeling that things are happening all the time is one key, but to show it.. Somehow it should be more clear to the students where is the actual "home" and from there you should have clear links to EVERY source needed and "see" others too (for example the feeds from blogs). Just ONE place where to go every day and check the current situation and do what is to be done.

I indeed learned also something new about collaboration. I´ve always been the hyperactive member of all the groups I´ve participated. I´ve done the tasks even alone if others didn´t do anything. It was quite a surprise to have another kind of role, more normal one I think ;) But I did feel I wasn´t doing enough and felt quite frustrated for not being able to do more - it was too difficult to jump in. Some of my tryings were even deleted which of course didn´t give much a courage.. But this was an important lesson. As was also this thing with being visible; how important it would be to have a certain place where all the group members / students can see that something IS actually happening all the time, the course is still going on.

I am used to taking responsibility for my own learning. It suits me, but I do need the contact with fellow students also. The discussions in the forums (or commenting and receiving comments like in this course) are very important. I need to reflect with others, get some support and see that I´m not alone doing stuff.

This really was a good experience. Maybe I´ll do my Master´s thesis about how to activate web students..

EMIM / E-Learning / Assignment 9

How well could I fulfill my goals?
Well, I was sure I would do more; create, write and "fuzzaround" making the group members to work.. But I ended up only commenting. Heh, I did try to do an actual evaluation plan but it was deleted (twice). So there was no plan done, just some questions. There were two hyperactive guys in our group who did almost everything - and deleted things they didn´t like. Good point was that they really did things and we others commented but I believe all of us would have enjoyed also the actual doing. They started out with force when I was still wondering the life of a mother, so I didn´t manage to jump in to their pace.

Besides commenting I also did comment other group member´s blogs, used a whole lot of not-so-familiar tools (Google Groups, Doodle Polls, Zoho...), put some links to the del.isio.us -account, wrote something about wikis as learning environments, did a lot of evaluation on other groups´courses and wrote a lot to this blog.

So I can say that I achieved quite much but would have done more also. Luckily I´ve studied quite a lot of eLearning (e.g. Mediapedagogy in university level for 25 ECTS points) so I don´t feel so left out. I do know that mostly it was up to me; I could have been more active but I know also that I would have done more if there wasn´t these guys who did almost everything. But it was good for the group that there were these active guys since I had my baby back then when it would have been time to be more active. It just happened that my baby got first :) She is little only once and she really needed me. And I enjoyed being with her so much. I still am with her all the time, now I just am more used to this situation and have more energy to study also. So I just have to settle for this what happened with this course, even tough I´m used to always do 110%.

EMIM / E-Learning / Week 14 Reflection

1. What was the most important thing you learned this week?
It´s been very quiet week.. With our group. Last week I evaluated the group 5, this week the groups 2, 3, 4, 6 & 9. Others (7, 8, 10) were not ready or didn´t have any place to evaluate.

2. What was particularly interesting/boring in this week?
It was very interesting to see what other groups had made :) The courses and the evaluation polls.

3. Was there something you didn't quite understand and want to know more about it?
Noup.

4. What kind of questions/ideas/experiences this week's activities raised for you?
Reflecting about other´s experiences.

5. Which tools did you use this week, explain what was the purpose of using these tools (e.g. social talk, to regulate my team activities, to work on documents)?
This blog & Moodle and our wiki. For evaluating others: their wikis, Google Groups and polls.

6. With whom did you communicate during this week, how many times, with which tools, and for what purposes?
I commented some of the team member´s blogs and the "global" blogs of this course. And did a lot of different polls, using wikis, blogs, getFAST.ca and GoogleDocs polls.

(This is here just to keep these in mind :)
Group works
Group1 course design
Group1 evaluation page
Group2 course design
Group2 evaluation page
Group3 course design
Group3 evaluation page
Group4 course design
Group4 evaluation page
Group5 course design
Group5 evaluation page
Group6 course design
Group6 evaluation page
Group7 course design
Group7 evaluation page
Group8 course design
Group8 evaluation page
Group9 course design
Group9 evaluation page
Group10 course design
Group10 evaluation page

EMIM / E-Learning / Week 13 Reflection

1. What was the most important thing you learned this week?
There were some interesting ways to collect evaluation, nice to learn about polls.

2. What was particularly interesting/boring in this week?
Evaluation of other groups.

3. Was there something you didn't quite understand and want to know more about it?
Noup.

4. What kind of questions/ideas/experiences this week's activities raised for you?
Lot´s of reflecting about other´s experiences.

5. Which tools did you use this week, explain what was the purpose of using these tools (e.g. social talk, to regulate my team activities, to work on documents)?
This blog & Moodle and our wiki. For evaluating others: their wikis, Google Groups and polls.

6. With whom did you communicate during this week, how many times, with which tools, and for what purposes?
In our wiki with the participants (it was very quiet week), I also commented some of the team member´s blogs and the "global" blogs of this course.